... [1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55
] which yields by extension the centrally important quotient phi, equivalent
(approximately) to 1.618. The inverse, 1
divided by phi (0.6180) is equally interesting.
At
school I always had difficulty with concepts like pi (approximately 22/7 or
3.141592 …) and with precisely where its use and significance lay. I didn’t know the Greek alphabet or why these
strange letters should be ascribed certain fixed values. Of course we were made to utilise pi to
determine the area and/or circumference of a given circle but it was all in the
nature of a number game – or worse, a dreaded SUM! Pi remained a mystery.. as it largely does to
this day. Did you know, for example that
the sequence of numbers after the decimal point would never reach an end, no
matter if all the material and energy in the world could be converted to printed
numbers to fill the spaces and all the computing power therein were applied to
this task? At least I’m told this,
though how it might be known is an even greater mystery to me. And why we should repeatedly apply ourselves
to a concept that is clearly so imprecise!
I
looked around me then and could see little use for, or examples of perfect
circles [with the possible exception of the sun and the moon] in nature - an impossible concept anyway, I
was informed in mathematics class, and thought that all of this belonged only in
the driest of all locations, school mathematics textbooks!
The
man-built environment loved the perfect lines and curves, squares and
rectangles beloved of our mathematics tutors but nature was strictly averse to
it all.
The
physical and the living environment showed signs of randomness instead, the
shapes of clouds, coastlines, river banks etc. and there were very few of the classical shapes on display in the living
world too. Mathematics wasn’t real!
Then
the concept of phi was introduced to us and more sums set. But it was all taught in isolation. Without circles (pretty in themselves) it was
even more meaningless! I could
understand when a five-pointed star was drawn and it was revealed to me that
the places of intersection of the lines joining points divided those lines in phi
proportion, because I could measure this with a rule. But could the teachers not have made all this
more immediately relevant by having us measure equivalent proportions in our
own bodies?
Here
are a few examples : Phi is revealed in the length proportionately of…
Your
total height divided by the distance from your belly-button to your soles…
The
distance from your shoulder to your fingertips divided by elbow-to-fingertips…
Hip
to floor divided by knee to floor, and
In
your finger and toe joints.
And
what is true for man is true for the other mammals and other animals, insects
etc. If God had a plan for life on
Earth, phi was central to that plan!
So
meaningful is it all, that in another more religious era this number became
known as the Divine Proportion.
The
great masters in music, science, philosophy, art and a multitude of other
pursuits were acutely aware of the ‘Divine Proportion’ or Golden Number
(Proportion) and utilised it freely in their works.
Let
us return to the Fibonacci sequence! Proceed to add numbers to the following sequence : 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55 … Easy, each consecutive number is the sum of
the two preceding numbers. Now divide
any of these numbers by the one preceding and you yield phi (1.616 .. or a
number progressively approaching that) : or by the number following and you
yield (0.6180). As we explained in our
earlier article, this can convert, in the case for example of sunflower seeds
flowering in spirals in the head to the related angle of 137.5˚ { 360˚ (1-Φ) ˚
= 137.5˚ where Φ = phi} which is the
only angle that will yield the maximum number of seeds concentrated in the
minimum space – and thus facilitate survival of the species in the competitive
world of nature. There is a
purpose. Christians who dominated
Western Thought for millennia called it God’s Purpose.
Did
you know that female bees dominate males in the hive in numbers in exact phi
proportion? There are other
examples. The cephalopod mollusc (and
others too of course) has spirals on its shell the ratio of whose diameter to
the next adjacent one is in keeping with the Golden Number, or Divine
Proportion, if you like. The same can be
found in the metre of poetry and the tempo of music: artwork by Michelangelo, Albrecht Durer,
Leonardo da Vinci and others demonstrated each artist’s adherence to the Divine
Proportion in the layout of their compositions: it is there in the architectural dimensions of the Greek Parthenon and
the Pyramids: and in the organisational
structures of Mozart’s sonatas, for example and Beethoven’s famous Fifth
Symphony as well as in the works of Bartok, Debussy and Schubert.
Meet
phi - also expressible as half the square root of 5, minus one - a very interesting number indeed!